🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."