🔗 Share this article

Picture the following: a smiling Rasmus Højlund wearing Napoli's colors. Next, place that with a dejected the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, appearing like he just missed a sitter. Do not bother finding an actual photo of that miss; context is your adversary. Then, include statistics in a large, comical font. Remember the emojis. Post it everywhere.

Would you mention that Højlund's goal count features scores in the premier European competition while Sesko does not compete in continental tournaments? Of course not. Nor would you note that several of Højlund's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is much stronger to Slovenia and generates far more scoring opportunities. If you manage online for a large outlet, raw engagement is what pays the bills, United are the biggest draw, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

Thus the cycle of content turns. The next job is to scan a 44-minute interview with the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he calls the acquisition of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where he qualifies his comments by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, cut that. Nobody needs that. Simply make sure "strange" and "the player" appear together in the title. The audience will be outraged.

This Time of Potential and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has long been one of my favourite periods to observe football. The leaves swirl, winds shift, squads and strategies are newly formed, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the coming months are staking their claims. The summer market is shut. Nobody is talking about the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are still in the game. Right now, anything is possible.

Yet, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my most disliked times to read about football. Because although no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. The City winger is resurgent. The German talent has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league at this moment? We need a decision immediately.

The Player as Patient Zero

In many ways, Benjamin Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The need to delay final conclusions, allowing technical development and strategic understanding to mature. And the demand to produce permanent verdicts, a constant stream of takes and memes, context-free criticisms and meaningless contrasts, a square that can not truly be circled.

I do not propose to provide a substantive evaluation of Sesko's time at United to date. He has started four times in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, found the net twice, and taken a mere of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we evaluating? And do I propose to duplicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits argue passionately on a popular show over whether he needs 10 goals to be a success this season (one pundit), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (Wright).

A Harsh Reality

Despite this I enjoyed watching him at Leipzig: a powerful, screeching sports car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: afforded the freedom to rampage but also the leeway to miss. And in part this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to load a short advertisement, the club with the largest and most ruthless gulf between the patience and space he requires, and the time and air he is going to get.

We saw a case of this over the national team pause, when a viral infographic conveniently stated that Sesko had been judged – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a survey of 20 agents. And of course, the press are not alone in such behavior. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically operating along the same principles, an environment explicitly geared for provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to us? Are we aware, on any level, what this infinite sluice of irritation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the inherent strangeness of being a player in the middle of this, aware on some surreal butterfly-effect level that every single thing about players is now essentially material, commodity, open-source property to be packaged and exchanged.

Indeed, partly this is because it's Manchester United, the entity that keeps nourishing the cycle, a major institution that must constantly be generating the big feelings. But also, partly this is a temporary malaise, a swing of judgment most clearly and cruelly glimpsed at this season, roughly four weeks after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been coveting footballers, praising them, drooling over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, many of those very players are already being dismissed as broken goods. Is it time to worry about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres wise? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

A Wider Issue

It seems fitting that he meets their rivals on Sunday: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at home in the Premier League and yet in their own state of perceived turmoil, like submitting a a report on someone who went to the shops half an hour ago. Too open. Their star finished. The striker waste of money. The coach bald.

Perhaps we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has begun to supplant football itself, to inflect the way we watch it, an entire sport repivoted around discussion topics and immediate responses, something that occurs in the background while we scroll through our devices, incapable to disconnect from the constant flow of opinions and further hot takes. It may be this player taking the hit at present. But in a way, we're all sacrificing a part of the experience here.